Governance Participation

On a Proof-of-Stake network, "governance" is the process of democratically proposing and voting on changes to the network. These changes might include updates to the network software, edits to the token economics, or even spending decisions for a community treasury. Put simply: governance is one of the most important forms of engagement for a network's community.

Many of the networks we operate on (see the full list, here) offer opportunities for governance, and we strive to be active participants. To help make our governance voting record transparent and accessible, we list our voting history, beginning in August 2022, below.

September 2022

Network Proposal ID Title Our Vote Notes Full Proposal
Regen 18 Add e-Money EEUR to marketplace allow list Abstain This was an initiative from e-money to add eEUR, a new asset-backed stablecoin, to the Regen Ecocredit Marketplace "allow list." While we've respected the e-Money team's work in the cosmos since our early days in the ecosystem, we chose to abstain conscientiously here due to not being familiar enough with the proposed stablecoin mechanism. You can learn more at the Regen Governance Forum discussion, here. Link
Stargaze 51 Marketplace v1.1 Migration Abstain Like Props 40 and 41 (details below), this was an initiative to upgrade the network's software to a new version. Like with Props 40 and 41, we chose to abstain conscientiously here due to being unable to fully audit the code during the voting period. Link
Stargaze 50 Increase the Stargaze active validator set from 120 to 130 Yes As the title suggests, this was an initiative to increase the number of spots for active Stargaze validators from 120 to 130. We voted in favor here to support decentralization by creating opportunities for more, smaller, independent validators to join in securing the network. Link
Stargaze 49 Imago - Finalizer Contract Abstain Following Props 47 and 48 (details below), this was an initiative to launch the finalizer contract for Imago. See the details for Prop 47 for more. Link
Stargaze 48 Imago - Minter Contract Abstain Following Prop 47 (details below), this was an initiative to launch the minter contract for Imago. See the details for Prop 47 for more. Link
Stargaze 47 Imago - SG721 Contract Abstain This was an initiative to launch the contract code for Imago, a tool that creates generative art using on-chain data. You can learn more at the Stargaze Governance Forum, here. Link
Agoric 15 Establishing the Economic Committee and electing the initial Economic Committee members Abstain This was an initiative to shape up the initial version of a body responsible for actively monitoring Inter Protocol, a Defi Protocol and associated "stable token" (called "IST") to be run on Agoric. We chose to abstain here for two main reasons: first, we felt generally that a decision this important merits a longer, deeper discussion than what was available during this voting period. Second, we felt like this would be better presented as two separate proposals—one to consider the details of the Economic Committee itself, and another to consider potential members for that Committee. You can see our comments in the discussion on the Agoric Governance Forum, here. Link
Osmosis 328 Regular Incentive adjustment for 2022-09-12 Yes This was the latest in a series of regular, recurring proposals to make adjustments to various pool incentives (see the proposal link for more details). Link
Osmosis 327 Regular Incentive adjustment for 2022-09-05 Yes This was the latest in a series of regular, recurring proposals to make adjustments to various pool incentives (see the proposal link for more details). Link
Osmosis 326 Signalling Proposal for OSMO/BLD pool (#795) incentivised pool Yes This was a proposal to signal support for adding BLD, the native token of the Agoric network, to the set of assets that receive special liquidty incentives on Osmosis. This would be a sign of the strategic importance of Agoric to Osmosis, and the Cosmos. We voted in support of this measure, and are active supporters of Agoric; you can find our validator for the network here. Link
Cosmos Hub 76 Require a minimum 5% commission for all validator nodes Yes This was an initiative to require all validator operators to set a minimum commission of 5%. Historically, the minimum commissiion has been set to 0%. This was set in the spirit of a "free-market" approach, but it meant that larger validators (e.g. those with more capital backing) could attract delegators by charging a lower commission than smaller validators, whose primary income may be from the commissions they charge. While we believe there's further discussion to be had around the best way to set these commissions, we voted in favor of the proposal as a first step towards enforcing greater support the smaller, independent validators that make the Cosmos ecosystem what it is. You can see our full comments on the Cosmos Hub Forum, here. Link
Regen 16 Adding Axelar USDC as a marketplace currency No This was an initiative to introduce the USDC stablecoin via the Osmosis-bridged Axelar. Due to errors discovered in this version of the proposal, it will be resubmitted as a new one. Link
Regen 15 Add Gravity USDC to Regen Marketplace Currency Allow List Abstain This was an initiative to introduce the USDC stablecoin via the Gravity Bridge to Ethereum. While we appreciated the thoughtful discourse around the proposal, we abstained conscientiously due to a number of open questions around bridge security and sustainability. You can see our full comments in the Regen Governance Forum, here. Link
Osmosis 325 Regular Incentive adjustment for 2022-08-29 Yes This was the latest in a series of regular, recurring proposals to make adjustments to various pool incentives (see the proposal link for more details). Link
Osmosis 324 Osmosis Support Lab Funding Round September - November 2022 Yes This was an initiative to approve the next round of funding for the "Osmosis Support Lab," the community-based user-support function for Osmosis. You can learn more about the Lab, here. We voted to support the helpful work the Lab does for the community. Link
Osmosis 323 Signalling Proposal: Removal of incentives from pool #690 MNTL/OSMO Abstain This was a proposal to remove $OSMO incentives from "Asset Mantle" pool, following accusations of "wash trading." We abstained conscientiously due to being unable to fully explore the details of the accusations. Link

August 2022

Network Proposal ID Title Our Vote Notes Full Proposal
Cosmos Hub 75 Establishing a definition of NoWithVeto Yes This was an initiative to clarify the defintion of the voting option "NoWithVeto," which has historically been confusing for governance participants. We voted to move forward with the proposed definition, but shared more detailed feedback on the Cosmos Hub Forum, here. Link
Agoric 14 Agoric Community Fund Policy Yes This was an initiative to formalize some guidelines for how funding decisions will be approved for the Agoric Community Fund. We voted in support of the increased clarity and utility that these new policies will help to provide. Link
Osmosis 322 [ION DAO] Initialize No Addressing the errors found after Prop 321, this was an intiative to, again, launch ION DAO. We abstained conscientiously due to being unable to fully audit the code. Link
Osmosis 321 [ION DAO] Initialize No This was an initiative to launch ION DAO, following props 316 and 315 below. The code was found to have errors, and the proposal was replaced by Prop 322 above. Link
Osmosis 319 Upload Apollo Liquid Staking Contract Abstain This was an initiative to launch Apollo's new liquid staking solution on Cosmos. You can learn more about Apollo at their blog, here. We abstained conscientiously, having been unable to conduct a full deep dive into Apollo. Link
Osmosis 318 Regular Incentive adjustment for 2022-08-22 Yes This was the latest in a series of regular, recurring proposals to make adjustments to various pool incentives (see the proposal link for more details). Link
Osmosis 316 [ION DAO] Store DAO contract's code Abstain Following Prop 315 below—which dealt with ION DAO's staking contract, allowing for token staking functionality—this was an initiative to install the DAO contract itself. Link
Osmosis 315 [ION DAO] Store staking contract's code Abstain The passage of the earlier Prop 120 signaled support for transferring ION tokens from the Osmosis genesis event to the then-nascent ION DAO, when technically possible. Prop 315 is an attempt, following the previously rejected Prop 305, to recognize that the transfer is now possible, and trigger it via the launch of ION staking contract on Osmosis. Link
Osmosis 310 Regular Incentive adjustment for 2022-08-15 Yes This was the latest in a series of regular, recurring proposals to make adjustments to various pool incentives (see the proposal link for more details). Link
Stargaze 41 Marketplace V1 Migration Abstain We abstained conscientiously due to being unable to audit the full code for the upgrade. Link
Agoric 12 Upgrade to agoric-upgrade-7 Abstain We abstained conscientiously due to being unable to audit the full code for the upgrade. Link
Stargaze 40 Marketplace Contract v1 Abstain This was an initiative to upload the smart contract for Stargaze Marketplace V1—now with a fix to the error uncovered in the review process for Prop 39! We abstained conscientiously due to being unable to audit the full code for the upgrade. Link
Stargaze 39 Marketplace Contract v1 No This was an initiative to upload the smart contract for Stargaze Marketplace V1. As Stargaze is an NFT marketplace app-chain, this was meant to be a big deal; however, an error in the contact code was uncovered, rendering this specific version unsafe to pass. Link
Regen 14 Regen Ledger v4.0 Upgrade Abstain This was an initiative to approve the upgrade to Regen Ledger v4.0. This update introduces a number of new features that unlock eco credit marketplace capabilities, new ledger functionality, and more. You can learn more about the details of the upgrade from the Regen team, here. We supported the direction of the upgrade here and were encouraged by the thorough proposal details; however, we chose Abstain to acknowledge that we were able neither to fully audit the code ourselves, nor to see the results of another code audit. This reflects an evolving and ongoing debate in the community around whose responsibility it is to audit code before launching, and where Validator operators like ourselves fit into the picture. We want to ensure that we’re being as thoughtful and transparent as possible. While that discussion develops across networks, we’ll continue to abstain conscientiously as appropriate. Link
Osmosis 309 Signaling Proposal for GLTO/OSMO (#778) incentivized pool Abstain This was an initiative to include the Gelotto token ($GLTO) in the list of assets that receive $OSMO liquidity incentives. Per the proposal, Gelotto is a "luck-based gaming platform that will initially offer lottery games for various IBC assets." Link
Osmosis 308 Regular Incentive adjustment for 2022-08-08 Yes This was the latest in a series of regular, recurring proposals to make adjustments to various pool incentives (see the proposal link for more details). Link
Osmosis 305 [ION DAO] Store staking contract's code Abstain The passage of the earlier Prop 120 signaled support for transferring ION tokens from the Osmosis genesis event to the then-nascent ION DAO, when technically possible. Prop 305 was an initiative to recognize that the transfer is now possible, and trigger it via the launch of ION staking contract on Osmosis. As you can see in the associated Commowealth discussion, it seems that the community rejected this proposal for rushing—though perhaps not deliberately—the process for reviewing and approving smart contract code on the network. Link
Osmosis 304 Increase Deposit for Proposals to 1600 OSMO Yes This was an initiative to increase the cost for submitting a proposal from 500 $OSMO to 1600 $OSMO, in an effort to disincentivize the submission of spam governance proposals. Link
Osmosis 299 Regular Incentive adjustment for 2022-08-01 Yes This was the latest in a series of regular, recurring proposals to make adjustments to various pool incentives (see the proposal link for more details). While we were aligned with the direction of the changes in this upgrade, we chose to Abstain as we didn't have the capacity within the voting period to fully audit the upgrade code. Link
Osmosis 296 Osmosis v11 Upgrade Abstain This was an initiative to approve the upgrade to Osmosis v11.0, the "Scambuster Upgrade." This update introduces some subtle, but meaningful changes to combat spam/scams on the network. You can learn more from the Osmosis Ministry of Marketing's announcement, here Link